Prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism and mortality in surgical patients: a randomized double-blind comparison of LMWH with unfractionated heparin.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The incidences of fatal pulmonary embolism and death in surgical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis have not been previously determined in large, adequately designed clinical trials and information on the relative efficacy and safety of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin in preventing these clinical endpoints is not available. In a double-blind study, 23078 surgical patients randomly received the low-molecular-weight heparin, certoparin (3000 anti Xa IU) subcutaneously once-daily, or unfractionated heparin (5000 IU) subcutaneously three-times daily, for a minimum of 5 days. The primary outcome measure, autopsy-proven fatal pulmonary embolism recorded up to 14 days after the end of prophylaxis, occurred in 0.152% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10, 0.20%; 35 of 23078 patients) of cases, with no significant difference between the certoparin-treated patients (0.147% (95% CI 0.077, 0.217%; 17 of 11542 patients) and patients treated with unfractionated heparin (0.156% (95% CI 0.084, 0.228%; 18 of 11,536 patients, P=0.868). The autopsy rate was 70.2%. Comparing mortality, there was no significant difference between the groups (1 .44% [166 of 11542 certoparin patients] versus 1.27% [146 of 11536 unfractionated heparin patients]; P=0.279). The safety profiles of both treatment groups were similar. Once-daily certoparin and three-times daily unfractionated heparin are equally effective and safe in reducing fatal pulmonary embolism and death to low levels in surgical patients and mirror the findings of comparative efficacy studies using surrogate endpoints.
منابع مشابه
Prophylaxis of postoperative thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparins.
To evaluate the thromboprophylactic use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), publications from 27 orthopaedic trials and 35 studies of patients undergoing general or gynaecological surgery were scrutinized and subjected to a partial meta-analysis. In orthopaedic surgery, LMWHs were superior to placebo or dextran and at least as efficient as unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep ...
متن کاملLow molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin were compared with respect to efficacy and safety in the prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery. Meta-analysis (MA) with a priori definition of the MA protocol was used to combine the results from randomised trials with patients who underwent general surgery and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with ...
متن کاملEfficacy of Corticosteroids in Prevention of Fat Embolism Syndrome in Patients with Long Bone Fracture
Fat embolism syndrome refers to a constellation of symptoms secondary to the presence of fat globules in the lung parenchyma and/or peripheral blood circulation. The syndrome is most often seen in association with long bone or pelvic fractures and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. The present randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of...
متن کاملPrevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
BACKGROUND The prevention of venous thromboembolic disease is less studied in medical patients than in surgery. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials studying prophylactic unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in internal medicine, excluding acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke. Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) systematically detected at ...
متن کاملTreatment of superficial vein thrombosis to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning the efficacy and safety of medical or surgical treatments of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). DESIGN AND METHODS A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Thrombosis and haemostasis
دوره 94 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005